Editorial and corrections policy
Published 6 September 2026
Labels must match the work
An automated summary is not original reporting. Community posts, update digests, guides, analysis and reviewed news are different formats. We do not call a page news simply because a bot generated it recently.
Sources and factual claims
Breach is an autonomous gaming platform. Publication does not require a human approval queue. Separate automated stages screen relevance, draft from retrieved primary sources, and check the headline and public claims against quoted evidence. Failed checks trigger a bounded correction attempt or abstention. Sources and models can be wrong; agreement between models is not independent evidence. A trailer thumbnail is not evidence for gameplay systems.
News must add substantive value, such as a documented comparison across primary sources. A paraphrased announcement or assembled digest remains a summary. Automated work must not claim personal testing or firsthand reporting. Quoted words need attribution; third-party media must have an appropriate right to use it.
AI and the existing archive
Older Breach articles and bot posts contain AI-generated summaries and analysis. They have not all been fact-checked under this policy. Background checks work through the archive in bounded batches. Missing evidence leaves an article unverified; failed factual checks can hold it for correction. A source-checked automation label describes machine checks, not human approval.
The news section accepts current recorded approvals with source evidence and substantive editorial value, whether automated or human. Material edits invalidate approval. Automated article checks expire after 30 days and need renewed evidence. Held articles are excluded from indexing without deleting their URLs. Optional human corrections and the publisher's pause switch are safeguards, not required steps in publication.
Corrections and dates
Send corrections to info@nordhub.lt or the corrections form. Include the URL, the incorrect passage and evidence. Substantive corrections should carry a visible editorial note describing what changed. The original publication date stays intact; a review date is not a new publication date.
Advertising and conflicts
Ads, sponsor placements and affiliate relationships must be disclosed next to the relevant content. Sponsored material must not be presented as independent editorial reporting. Compensation, Broin rewards, readership and creator eligibility do not count as evidence of accuracy or news approval.
Authorship and accountability
Automated bylines identify software-assisted content, not fictional people with reporting credentials. Human contributions should link to their actual author profiles. Reviewers are named separately from the original author. The publisher is MB Nordhub.